Diet & Exercise--the most common phrase whenever the topics of obesity and weight loss arise. At the end of the day, achieving or maintaining a healthy weight is simple: eat healthier and exercise more.
Or is it that simple?
The millions of people who have tried this approach, and failed, can testify that there's something going on besides calories in through food and calories expended through exercise.
Mayo Clinic endocrinologist James A. Levine has discovered a third major player--more important, even, than diet and exercise combined--in regulating weight levels. It's called NEAT, short for non-exercise activity thermogenesis. NEAT is the energy we expend in everyday activities such as fidgeting, cleaning, gardening, or cooking. When you're not sleeping or sitting, and when you're not actively exercising, you're producing NEAT. This short interview with All Things Considered explains the basics of NEAT:
Through a rigorous research study involving precisely calibrated meals, high-tech underwear, and $1,000 drinks to ensure study participants weren't "cheating" with outside foods, James Levine discovered that NEAT explains why some people weigh more and others less, despite similar levels of food intake and exercise. From his primer on NEAT:
For the vast majority of dwellers in the U.S., exercise activity thermogenesis is negligible. NEAT, even in avid exercisers, is the predominant constituent of activity thermogenesis and is the EE [energy expenditure] associated with all the activities we undertake as vibrant, independent beings....In other words, a person's level of exercise (running, swimming, biking, etc.) has only a small effect on her total energy expenditure and thus her body weight. Levine's research study found that overweight people expend far less NEAT than people at a normal body weight--even after they have lost weight. The reverse is true for lean people who gain weight artificially (i.e., on purpose for a research study such as Levine's). From a Mayo Clinic report of Levine's research:
NEAT is likely to contribute substantially to the inter- and intra-personal variability in EE. Argue thus; if three-quarters of the variance of BMR [basal metabolic rate] is accounted for by variance in lean body mass and, TEF [thermic effect of food ] represents 10-15 percent of total EE, then the majority of the variance in total EE that occurs independent of body weight must be accounted for by NEAT. Evidence supports this. NEAT is highly variable and ranges from ~ 15 percent of total daily EE in very sedentary individuals to >50 percent in highly active persons. Even minor changes in physical activity throughout the day can increase daily EE by 20 percent. NEAT is impacted by environment, but is also under biological control.
NEAT — more powerful than formal exercise — determines who is lean, and who is obese. Obese persons sit, on average, 150 minutes more each day than their naturally lean counterparts. This means obese people burn 350 fewer calories a day than do lean people....Levine is actively involved in developing real-life, affordable solutions for increasing people's NEAT. Levine has built a working "treadmill office," complete with a 2-lane walking track that serves as the meeting room and desks equipped with treadmills rather than chairs. By walking at 0.7 mph instead of sitting at a desk, a person expends 800 additional calories per day just by going to work.
[Levine] adds that the NEAT defect in obese patients doesn't reflect a lack of motivation. "It most likely reflects a brain chemical difference because our study shows that even when obese people lose weight they remain seated the same number of minutes per day," says Dr. Levine. "They don't stand or walk more. And conversely, when lean people artificially gain weight, they don't sit more. So the NEAT appears to be fixed. But as physicians, we can use this data to help our obese patients overcome low NEAT by guiding the treatment of obesity toward a focus on energy as well as food. We can encourage NEAT-seeking behaviors."
Lynne Rossetto Kasper of The Splendid Table visited Levine's treadmill office and has this fascinating report (approx. 10 minutes).
If you want to learn more about NEAT and how to incorporate it into your everyday routines, you can read Move a Little, Lose a Lot: New N.E.A.T. Science Reveals How to Be Thinner, Happier, and Smarter. And if you can, walk rather than drive to the library!
NEAT is a primary component of paleo/primal/evo-fit/etc folks, who also advocate diets radically different than what was pushed on people as 'healthy' the last 30-40 years. they also get the results that aren't supposed to happen with dieting (fat loss that remains gone, healthy metabolic transitions, etc.)
ReplyDeletethey would suggest, fairly validly i think, that regular movement at a slow pace for hours was part of 'exercise'.
the cult of cardio and whole grains and low-fat is the 'diet and exercise' that doesn't improve health or produce long-term fat loss. and yes, under that rubric, NEAT isn't 'exercise'.
diet and exercise pre-ancel keys is very different than diet and exercise post-ancel keys. mainly because though people didn't have fancy terms like NEAT for it, they were engaging in a synergy of food consumption and movement that was sufficient to prevent fat gain of the types we see now. also they had access to more unprocessed food of all types.
We also have to remember that our bodies have memory. When we eat an excess amount of calories that needs to be stored as fat, our body makes cells to do so. When we try to get of this fat, the cells do not just disappear, and our body tries to maintain what it created since it perceives it as a good thing.
ReplyDeleteAll in all, the amount of people who regain all their weight within the first year is enormous.
I do believe that a strictly primal high fat and paleo diet is the best way to go for loosing weight and keeping it off. It is probably the only diet that helps the body get rid of the extra cells because it turns the fat storing cells into fat burning cells.
Neat!
ReplyDeleteSuddenly gardening has taken on a whole new importance.
Great concept! The book was about 100 times longer than it should've been, though - get something better when you walk to the library!
ReplyDelete