Showing posts with label skin-to-skin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label skin-to-skin. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 06, 2016

Two must-read pieces on physiology and "pronurturance"

Understanding and promoting physiology in childbirth has been an interest of mine since my graduate school years. See, for example, my one of my comprehensive exams that asked me to reflect on the intersection of childbirth and environmentalism, in which I explored biodynamic approaches to both our natural and our maternal environments.

I want to share two fascinating pieces that make a case for respecting and facilitating the hormonal physiology of childbirth, with the end goal of healthier mother-baby pairs:

The first is the article "Hormonal Physiology of Childbearing, an Essential Framework for Maternal–Newborn Nursing" by Carol Sakala, Amy M. Romano, and Sarah J. Buckley (JOGNN 45.2 264-275). From the abstract:

Knowledge of the hormonal physiology of childbearing is foundational for all who care for childbearing women and newborns. When promoted, supported, and protected, innate, hormonally driven processes optimize labor and birth, maternal and newborn transitions, breastfeeding, and mother–infant attachment. Many common perinatal interventions can interfere with or limit hormonal processes and have other unintended effects. Such interventions should only be used when clearly indicated. High-quality care incorporates salutogenic nursing practices that support physiologic processes and maternal–newborn health.

The second is a PhD thesis by Florence Anne Saxton of Southern Cross University: Pronurturance at birth and risk of postpartum haemorrhage: biology, theory and new evidence. (PDF here) From the abstract:

Background: In spite of the almost universal adoption of the active management of the 3rd stage of labour, postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) rates continue to rise; reaching 19% or more in some obstetric units. Conversely, there is emerging evidence that women who experience continuity of midwifery care have lower rates of PPH. Continuity of midwifery care normally includes immediate skin-to-skin contact and early breastfeeding in the 3rd and 4th stages of labour to optimise release of endogenous oxytocin. The objective was to determine if skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding at birth affected the rate of early PPH in a group of mixed risk Australian women.
Method: De-identified birth records (N=11,219) for the calendar years 2009 and 2010 were extracted from the electronic ObstetriX database which records public sector births in New South Wales, Australia. Excluded (n = 3,671) were all cases where skin-to-skin and breastfeeding immediately after birth was not possible leaving 7,548 cases for analysis. The outcome measure was PPH of 500 ml or more; the independent variables were ‘skin-to-skin contact’ and ‘breastfeeding’ at birth (the combination of these two variables I ultimately termed pronurturance). Analyses were conducted to determine the risk of PPH for women who experienced skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding at birth in the 3rd and 4th stages of labour compared with those women who did not (regardless of the woman’s risk status or mode of birth).
Results: Women who experienced skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding at birth had an almost fourfold decrease in risk of PPH, (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.20-0.33, p < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates women who experienced skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding at birth were again less likely to have a PPH (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.72, p < 0.001). This protective effect of ‘pronurturance’ on PPH held true in sub-analyses for both women at ‘lower’ risk (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.17-0.30, p < 0.001) and ‘higher’ risk (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24-0.57, p < 0.001) of PPH.
Conclusion: These results suggest that skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding in 3rd and 4th stages of labour was effective in reducing the risk of PPH in a group of mixed risk Australian women. The explanation of this finding is that skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding promote optimal endogenous oxytocin release. Skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding at birth has shown no known negative effects and should be encouraged for all women during 3rd and 4th stage labour care.

Here are some core elements of a physiological labor & birth

Mother moves freely & chooses her positions during labor

Quiet, private environment

Unobtrusive birth attendants



Spontaneous, mother-directed pushing and upright maternal positioning


Immediate & prolonged skin-to-skin contact

Still skin-to-skin, even when moving from tub to bed

Skin-to-skin and breastfeeding ad infinitum


Read more ...

Saturday, August 01, 2015

Things I'm loving right now

Only four days left  until we fly across the Atlantic! In between last-minute repairs and deep cleaning, I wanted to share some favorite things I bookmarked this past month:

Homebirths in Spain
Read about the struggle to access home births in Spain, including hurdles mothers have faced birthing outside the Spanish medical system.

Effect of skin to skin and breastfeeding on primary postpartum hemorrhage
This recent research investigates the effect of S2S and BF right after birth on reducing primary PPH rates and found a strong positive correlation. The paper is titled Does skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding at birth affect the rate of primary postpartum haemorrhage: Results of a cohort study.

Upright birth support
A Scottish midwife designed an inflatable birth support called Comfortable Upright Birth that's being used around the world. Read about it here:



If you buy a CUB, the company donates a clean birth kit to mothers in developing countries. With every 5 birth kits, they include a CUB as well! So consider buying one for yourself if you are expecting or for your practice if you are a birth attendant.




Breech!

Home Birth
Read more ...

Saturday, July 06, 2013

NüRoo Pocket (babywearing shirt)

When Ivy was 4 weeks old, NüRoo founder Daniela Jensen sent me a NüRoo Pocket to test out and review.

I was super excited when I found out that babywearing shirts existed. I'd been searching for something that would hold my baby skin-to-skin and keep me clothed at the same time.


The NüRoo Pocket consists of a stretchy wraparound shirt with 3/4 length sleeves and velcro closures, plus a separate adjustable support belt (optional, used when you're walking or standing). The front of the shirt has a little pocket for the baby's lower legs. It is made of a wicking 90% polyester and 10% spandex and feels similar to UnderArmor fabric. It worked well in cold weather, but the shirt was definitely warm and sweaty once the hot, humid summer weather began. A short sleeve or tank top option would be a great addition to the NüRoo line, I think!

I received a M/L size, and I'd definitely recommend choosing the smaller of two sizes if you're in between. I'm a solid medium (US size 10, sometimes 8) and if I were any smaller, I'd choose the smaller size.


To put the baby in, you put your arms in the sleeves, place the baby in the pocket, and close each side. Then attach the support belt to secure the baby's weight. Like this:

NuRoo Pocket: Demo Video from NuRoo Baby on Vimeo.

I really, really wanted to fall in love with the NüRoo Pocket. I love babywearing and I love doing skin-to-skin with my newborns. I liked it, but I also had some frustrations with the shirt. After a while, the support belt gave me a backache. It pulls all the weight forward onto your lower back. Ivy would also gradually slip down, no matter how far I tightened the belt or how tight I fastened the shirt.

I think the biggest drawback is the timing of when I received the NüRoo Pocket. By 4 weeks postpartum, I was fully back into my normal, active life. The NüRoo Pocket is best for those early, snuggly weeks when you're (ideally) resting and keeping off your feet. I would have used it every day right after Ivy's birth.

Here's a picture of Ivy snuggled into the NüRoo. I took it last week. I'm guessing she's at the upper limit of what the shirt can carry. She's nice and chubby :) Sorry for the picture quality--I had to cajole Zari into snapping photos while we were packing for vacation.


I found that you can also use a sash or scarf of your own in lieu of a support belt--a great way to change the look of the NüRoo!

Retails for $59.99 at Babies R Us
.
Read more ...

Friday, June 28, 2013

Interview with NüRoo Pocket founders

As co-founders of NüRoo, Hope and Daniela have 8 kids between them, are certified by the US Institute for Kangaroo Care (USIKC) and passionate about attachment parenting. Hence the tagline of their brand, "Closest to Mom. Best for Baby."

Hope, Daniela, and their eight children

Q: Tell us about you..

Our path to parenting couldn't have been more different. Hope struggled with conceiving and found her way through IVF, adoption and in the end natural child birth. Daniela became a mom to her husband's 1, 4 and 6 year olds prior to delivering their last two daughters. Our families are big, boisterous and nothing short of inspiring. Among the madness, we found each other and found NüRoo from our shared passion for the tie between mom and baby. Society does a good job making us second guess our intuition, and ironically medicine has further complicated the natural process. Instinctively, innately, we KNOW how to care for our babies, and our bodies are equipped with all the tools needed to do so.

Q: What made you think to create the NüRoo Pocket?

Hope: I was introduced to the practice of skin-to-skin contact by a nurse midwife at my time of delivery. Following the birth of my daughter, Elle was immediately placed on my chest, and my midwife began telling me all of the amazing physiologic benefits that skin-to-skin offers. I learned that in order to give and receive all of these advantages, she needed to be on my skin for an uninterrupted 60 minutes. That seemed reasonable until I arrived home and was greeted by my two very excited three-year-olds. I needed something that could help me give my baby the benefits of skin-to-skin, but allowed me to be active with my family.

Daniela: When Hope shared her thoughts for the Pocket, I couldn't stop spouting off ideas. I too practiced Skin-to-Skin for the benefits offered to me and my babies but not nearly as much as I wanted to. I loved the promise of the product and envisioned a brand designed to offer early advantages and foster the bond between mom + baby.

The NüRoo Pocket helps baby transition from the womb to the outside world.

Q: How did you go from concept to finished product?

Over the course of a sleepless 9 months, we conducted countless test fits with moms and newborns, using their feedback and working with a seamstress to perfect our design. We took the final prototypes to an industry veteran to help us land at the right factory . There are so many things to consider (price, standards compliance, labeling, quality of construction, turn around time, duty fees, etc.) that working with someone to guide you through this process is invaluable. To those mompreuners in the making, if you don’t have existing relationships that can help with this, seek out a sourcing agent who can see you through.

Q: You refer to Skin-to-Skin Contact as a "practice" -- why is that? 

Believe it or not, there's a right and wrong way to do it. The benefits of skin-to-skin are derived from stimulating the c-afferent nerves. There are a lot of misconceptions around this. Not all skin-on-skin contact delivers the same benefits (i.e.: baby across mom's belly or their cheek to her chest). Because there's a proper position and suggested duration of time, skin-to-skin Contact is intentional and thus said to be a "practice."

Simply by holding baby vertically on your bare chest, you enhance your baby's immunity, improve sleep and weight gain, and stabilize their heart rate and breathing, all while speeding your own recovery time, reducing your risk for postpartum depression and increasing your milk supply. The benefits begin immediately with less crying/colic and temperature regulation. During the 60 minutes after the birth, skin-to-skin contact accelerates your baby's brain development.

The newborn stage is coined the 4th trimester because of how immature baby is. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends skin-to-skin immediately after birth until the first feeding and throughout the postpartum period. 40 years of research tells us that skin-to-skin should happen for as often, as long, and as frequently as possible.

Q: With 40 years of research behind the practice, why now?

As you've said, "institutional inertia" is all too common. (Daniela): "With my delivery in 2009, baby was separated immediately after birth for routine procedures then placed skin-to-skin until the first breastfeeding. The benefits of Skin-to-Skin weren't talked about. Thankfully, with the baby friendly initiatives, the surgeon general's call to action and the CDC's recommendation for Skin-to-Skin, hospitals are finally implementing new protocol. After the birth of my youngest in 2011, my baby was immediately placed on my chest and the benefits of skin-to-skin were explained in the mom + baby unit."

In an effort to drive awareness, we're on a mission to educate both moms and providers. We're attending key national organization conferences (ILCA, ACNM, USLCA, etc.) and have met and spoken with amazing women doing tremendous things for the well-being of mom and baby. We're collaborating with those trying to evoke change. There is a direct correlation between skin-to-skin and breastfeeding rates in relation to initiation, duration and exclusivity ties. The research speaks volumes, and finally our nation is responding. Every mom wants what is best for her baby. Once she has the knowledge, the product gives her the time.


Stay tuned for my review of the NüRoo Pocket in a few days!

Read more ...

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Implementing skin-to-skin in a hospital

Alethea, a labor & delivery nurse in a small community hospital, wrote this guest post about how to implement skin-to-skin in a hospital. Sometimes a big change in policy starts with just one nurse's efforts! 


If you would like to get in touch with Alethea, please leave your email address in the comments or send me an email, which I will forward on to her. She is more than happy to answer your questions.

As expectant mothers near the end of pregnancy, they begin to prepare themselves mentally and physically for the upcoming birth of their baby. While imagining what labor and birth might be like for them, they often daydream about holding their baby in their arms for the first time, immediately after birth. It is instinctive for new mothers to want to hold their babies close, nourish them, and keep them safe and warm.

In recent years, studies have shown what mothers have known in their hearts since the beginning of time: that skin-to-skin contact immediately following birth is best for mothers and their healthy babies. Healthy newborns placed skin-to-skin on their mother have a surprisingly easy time adjusting to life outside the womb. Skin-to-skin contact helps keep babies warm. Babies also cry less, have more stable blood sugar levels, sleep more, experience less pain from painful procedures, and are interested in breastfeeding sooner than newborns who are separated from their mothers.

I am a labor and delivery nurse in a small community hospital. We attend the deliveries of 350-450 births per year. I began recognizing that it was not a part of our culture to support immediate skin-to-skin contact with new moms and babies. Often, doing as they were trained to do, nurses would whisk the baby over the warmer, clean her up, weigh her, measure her, administer baby meds, etc while the placenta was being delivered and the physician was repairing the mom’s perineum if needed. Often, I then witnessed the baby being wrapped up in multiple layers of blankets, with only his face visible to finally meet his mother mother for the first time 15-20 minutes after birth. My colleagues and I were simply task-oriented; we did not recognize what we were denying these moms and babies. We were all trained under a medical model of obstetrical care, and we were simply trying to get our jobs done as efficiently as possible. Ah, but old dogs can be taught new tricks (or ancient tricks that they just didn’t know yet)!

When I was first training as a labor and delivery nurse, I worked in a large urban city hospital that had both midwifery-model care delivered by certified nurse midwives, as well as medical-model care delivered by physicians. (Granted, some midwives seemed to function under the medical model and some physicians seemed more midwifery-model oriented, but that is another story.) In my training and subsequent employment, I witnessed the beauty and the benefits of providing immediate skin-to-skin contact between moms and babies, as it was strongly supported by the midwives with whom I worked. I feel so blessed to have had the midwifery model of care as a part of my training. Many moms and babies have benefited from what I learned from those midwives (and some physicians).

So, how did we go about changing the culture of our little community hospital? It all seems to be a bit of a blur, and I might be getting some of the details out of order. My apologies to my colleagues if that is the case! Taking into consideration that the predominate culture of our department has always been doing what is best for moms and babies, I think this particular change started with leading by example. When I attended a birth as the baby nurse (we always have two nurses attend every delivery, one for mom and one for baby), I began to put babies skin to skin with their moms. When I was the labor nurse, I urged the baby nurse to get the baby skin to skin as soon as possible, asking them to leave all the non-urgent admission tasks for me to complete later. If the baby was brought to mom all wrapped up, I would simply unwrap the baby and get him skin to skin with his mom. We began to have discussions at the nurse’s station about which of our nursing tasks can wait (most of them), and we talked about how easy it really is to do those tasks that could not wait right on the mom’s chest. For those nurses who felt they did not have time to come back later to do admission procedures on my babies, I volunteered to do everything myself. And slowly the culture started to shift.

In 2007, AWHONN published an article, Skin-to-skin Contact: Giving Birth Back to Mothers and Babies (PDF). I printed up copies of the article and left them around the department, requesting that all the nurses read it. I sent copies to the recovery room staff and anesthesiologist. Over time, I began to notice more nurses starting to incorporate skin-to-skin into their routine practices. We were gaining momentum.

Over the past couple of years, the nursing staff and physicians I work with have successfully integrated immediate skin-to-skin contact as a standard of care for healthy babies born by vaginal birth. Because we strongly believe in the importance of providing safe, quality, family centered maternity care, we are always looking for ways to improve the services we provide the new families in our community. So why stop what we now know is the right thing to do with just vaginal births?

We all know that when cesarean birth becomes necessary, it often brings an unexpected and unwelcome separation of the mother from her newborn baby. Even when cesarean births are planned, I can’t imagine the longing so many mothers must have felt during the time they are separated from their babies. It is not uncommon for it to take between 40 minutes to over an hour be reunited with their baby. (Side note: because we are a very small hospital, we do not staff our own operating room or recovery room.) As we witnessed the gentle transition to life outside the womb with infants placed skin to skin with their mothers after vaginal birth, I began to wonder why we could not also support this amazing time for healthy moms and their babies born by cesarean.

Our department was looking for a quality improvement goal for the upcoming year. At our staff meeting in November 2010, I suggested we begin to offer and support skin-to-skin contact in the operating room. We had already tried, with inconsistent success, to bring babies back to PACU (a recovery room that is staffed with different staff than the LD unit) to breastfeed. (Again, another story as to why that hasn’t been very successful.) So why not just prevent the separation in the first place and keep the babies with mom in the OR?


My colleagues were all on board and we set a very ambitious goal of providing skin-to-skin contact in the OR for 75% of our cesarean-born babies within 3 months of beginning the initiative. I am excited to report that after two months into our initiative we have supported immediate skin-to-skin with 53% of cesarean-born babies at our hospital. We do have a little ways to go, but it is absolutely worth celebrating that over half of babies born by cesarean are now getting to spend this valuable time with their mothers.

Prior to beginning the initiative, we did a little ground work. I spoke to the head of anesthesia about our plan. While some of his colleagues were not as enthusiastic about it as I had hoped, we got the go-ahead to move forward on a case-by-case basis. As the anesthesiologists have all been able to witness the beauty of this time, they are now all very supportive (or at least not negative) about it! We also decided to clearly define the criteria for both mom and babies to participate in the initiative (stable vital signs, no O2 requirement or respiratory distress for baby, no nausea/vomiting for mom, mom wants to participate, etc). We got the full support of the Neonatal Nurse Practitioners who attend all cesareans and let the pediatricians know that the babies would not be coming back to labor and delivery for their first admission exam as soon as they previously had been. We were all set to begin on December 1st, 2010.

Just a few days before Christmas, I was working with a first-time laboring mom and her partner. Kelly was in the middle of a medically indicated induction, and was hoping for a vaginal birth with minimal intervention. As the day progressed and despite that fact that she had been working extremely hard for many hours, she experienced very little cervical change. She was exhausted and disheartened by the news. At that point she decided to receive an epidural. After many more hours, and despite exhausting all other options, there was still no cervical change. Kelly and her physician agreed that a cesarean birth was necessary. As I was preparing her for this change in plan, I let her know that there was a good possibility that at least one part of her birth plan would not be disturbed. All went as planned. Both Kelly and and her baby Simone did very well and met our defined criteria. Not only did we place Kelly and baby Simone skin to skin in the OR for nearly 30 minutes, Simone even breastfed briefly in the OR!

When she later sent me copies of the photos I took of this special time with their camera, Kelly said:
It was incredibly meaningful to have Simone with me immediately after her birth. That very special moment of togetherness is what so many mothers look forward to, and I did, too: After 9 months of pregnancy and the effort of labor, it felt like a huge reward to finally touch our baby, to face her and have her in my arms. A cesarean birth really enforces a distance between mom and child, but the opportunity to embrace Simone right away really did help me overcome those feelings of alienation. It allowed me to be one of the first to welcome her into the world, which is, I think, a mother's right--certainly it's something I think all moms hope for.
Pictures of Kelly and Simone in the OR:
 
 
 
 

Cindy, a LD RN, loves witnessing the bonding and connectedness that skin-to-skin in the OR promotes. “It makes it so much more real,” she commented. Kristi (RN) added that “it makes the surgical birth experience so much more personal and meaningful.” As a Birthing From Within mentor as well as and LD nurse, I know in my heart that cesarean birth is still a sacred time for new families. All births, cesarean or vaginal, represent not only the birth of a baby, but also the birth of a mother, a father and a family. My hope is that supporting ways to make cesarean birth feel less clinical and more sacred will save a lot of heartache, feelings of disconnectedness, and feelings of loss over an unexpected and often unwished-for outcome. Allowing moms and babies to connect immediately after any birth is the right thing to do, and I feel it is my job to protect this sacred time.

I believe that with a little time, patience and education, all LD departments can do what we are now doing to support skin-to-skin for all mothers and babies. If you are interested in learning more about how you too can bring skin-to-skin in the OR in your hospital, please don’t hesitate to contact me. (Send Rixa an email, and she will forward it on to me.)
Read more ...

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Extended skin-to-skin contact

The benefits of skin-to-skin contact immediately after birth are well-known (see, for example, the Cochrane review, the Lamaze Healthy Birth Practice #6, and the WHO summary of research). But what about extended skin-to-skin contact in the weeks or months after birth? Does it make any difference in outcomes such as breastfeeding rates or mother-baby relationships?

Thanks to a post by the Breastfeeding Coalition of Boone, Clinton, and Montgomery County blog, I learned of multi-disciplinary research conducted in Nova Scotia, Canada on the outcomes of extended skin-to-skin contact. The researchers have produced two DVDs, viewable for free, explaining their findings:
There is also a discussion guide (PDF) for the DVDs.

still shot from "Enhancing Baby's First Relationship"

So what did the study examine, and what were the findings? 
The study examined the effects of skin-to-skin contact over the first 3 months of life. Researchers from psychology, nursing, medicine, nutrition, and anthropology helped with the study. Over 100 mothers and their full-term babies participated. One group was given no special instructions; the other was instructed to do skin-to-skin with their babies during the first month after birth. Both groups of mothers kept records of how much skin-to-skin contact they had with their babies.

Research assistants visited each mother-baby pair at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after the birth. They took records of how much skin-to-skin contact the baby had on a daily basis, noted whether the mother was breastfeeding or formula feeding, had the mother complete a postpartum depression scale, observed the mother feeding her baby, and recorded a session while the mother was playing with her baby.

During the first week, the skin-to-skin group provided on average 5 hours of skin to skin [not sure if it was 5 hours per day or per week]. After the first week, the average dropped to 3 hours through the first month of life. The control group had little or no skin-to-skin contact with their babies.

The researchers' key findings were that skin-to-skin contact through the first month of life
  • Helped mothers maintain their choice to breastfeed
  • Increased mother's sensitivity to her baby
  • Reduced postpartum depression
  • Increased baby's alertness
  • Enhanced baby's responsiveness to their mother
The DVD features interviews with the researchers, mothers and fathers who participated in the study, and health care professionals commenting on the significance of skin-to-skin contact. It also shows video footage of mother-baby pairs interacting, nursing, and playing. It's remarkable how profoundly extended skin-to-skin influences outcomes for mothers, babies, and their developing relationships.

For more information, please contact:
Dr. Ann Bigelow
St. Francis Xavier University
P.O. Box 5000
Antigonish, NS
B2G 2W5
Canada
Read more ...

Sunday, January 09, 2011

Review of DVD "Skin to Skin in the First Hour After Birth"

I am the professional outreach coordinator for my local breastfeeding coalition. At our last meeting, we discussed how to spend funds from a breastfeeding grant we're applying for. We came up with several ideas:
I suggested providing copies of the DVD "Skin to Skin in the First Hour After Birth: Practical Advice for Staff after Vaginal and Cesarean Birth" to our three local hospitals. I first learned about this DVD at this years' Lamaze Conference in Milwaukee. Linda Smith showed excerpts of it during her presentation on how birthing practices affect breastfeeding. I loved what I saw and asked the producers, Healthy Children, for a review copy. The DVD just came out in 2010 and teaches hospital staff how and why to provide immediate, uninterrupted skin-to-skin contact after birth.

The DVD has three main sections. Section 1, "Advantages of Skin to Skin in the First Hour and Examples of the Baby's Stages" (15 minutes) first reviews the short- and long-term benefits of skin-to-skin care for both mothers and babies. Next, this section explains the 9 observable stages of a newborn placed skin-to-skin in the first hour of life. These stages usually occur in the following order: Birth Cry, Relaxation, Awakening, Activity, Rest, Crawling, Familiarization, Suckling, and Sleeping. Each of these stages is illustrated with video footage and explained by the narrator. We see several different mother-baby pairs going through these stages with both cesarean and vaginally born babies, and we see how many minutes after birth each stage typically occurs.

Section 2, "Skin to Skin after a Vaginal Birth" (9 minutes), instructs staff how to prepare parents for skin-to-skin contact during prenatal visits and upon labor admission. Next, this section offers several practical instructions for how to facilitate skin-to-skin contact. The advice addresses topics ranging proper maternal clothing, routine infant care and admission procedures (which should be done while the baby is on the mother's chest, and with the goal of disturbing the baby as little as possible), keeping the mother-baby pair covered with warm blankets as necessary, and providing supports for the baby's head and mother's arms.

Section 3, "Skin to Skin after a Cesarean Birth" (11 minutes), offers instruction for facilitating immediate skin-to-skin contact after a cesarean section. Some of the advice is the same as for vaginal births (prenatal counseling, maternal clothing during the delivery, supports for the mother's arms, or keeping baby and mother skin-to-skin with warm, dry blankets on top as needed). Other advice is specific to cesarean surgeries, such as keeping surgical equipment away from the baby, positioning the baby properly in relation to the surgical drape and the mother's body, or transporting mother and baby together skin-to-skin from the OR to the recovery room. As with the section on vaginal birth, we see the different newborn stages illustrated in the video footage, along with how many minutes it took for that particular baby to reach the stage.

Both sections 2 and 3 have extensive video footage showing care providers how skin-to-skin care works in a "real life" hospital environment. These two sections also address providing skin-to-skin care if either the mother or baby needs special assistance. In many cases, the baby can be cared for directly on the mother's chest. If the mother needs medical attention and cannot hold the baby, the father or partner should provide skin-to-skin care until the mother is stable. We see fathers doing skin-to-skin after both vaginal and cesarean births  when the mother could not have the baby on her chest for medical reasons.

My thoughts and reactions
Even though I am used to seeing mothers and babies skin-to-skin after birth (most of the births I attended as a doula were at home, where the practice is routine), I was still impressed with how much the pace just...slowed...down in Skin to Skin in the First Hour After Birth. I've seen lots of immediate skin-to-skin care, but not necessarily baby-led breast crawls. I would like to try this with my next baby. I wonder if I'll have the patience to do so!

I highly recommend this DVD, especially for those wishing to implement skin-to-skin care in a hospital setting. The DVD is short, easy to understand, and affordable. I anticipate that this DVD would be a tremendous help in overcoming care provider & staff resistance to doing skin-to-skin care, especially after cesarean sections. Once you see it in practice, you realize how simple it really is. Baby goes on mom, mom and baby rest and relax together, and the staff easily perform any necessary procedures with the baby and mom right in the same place.

My only suggestion for improvement would be to make the DVD easier to find and purchase. It is sold through  Healthy Children's online bookstore and is easy to miss as you're scrolling down the page. You can't order it directly online; instead, you have to mail, fax, or phone in your order. I would recommend making the DVD easier to find on the bookstore page--perhaps with some pictures of the cover and embedded excerpts from the DVD--and adding a Paypal button so people can purchase it immediately online. I would also love to see this DVD sold on Amazon.

Healthy Children is just about to release another DVD about skin-to-skin care aimed at parents, called The Magical Hour: Holding Your Baby Skin to Skin for the First Hour After Birth. I hope to review this DVD as soon as it is available!

Other reviews of this DVD are located at Lamaze's Science & Sensibility.

Skin to Skin in the First Hour After Birth
Executive producer and videographer: Kajsa Brimdyr, PhD, CLC
Executive and content producers: Kristin Svensson, RN, PhD (cand.) and Ann-Marie Widström, PhD, RN, MTD.
DVD, 2010
39 minutes
$39.00
Click here to download an order form (PDF). You may also order by phone (508-888-8044) or fax (508-888-8050).
Read more ...

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Early skin-to-skin contact after birth: the more, the better

A new study in the Journal of Human Lactation, available online in advance of the print edition, examined the effect of early skin-to-skin (S2S) contact on exclusive breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge. In Effect of Early Skin-to-Skin Mother—Infant Contact During the First 3 Hours Following Birth on Exclusive Breastfeeding During the Maternity Hospital Stay, Leslie Bramson and co-authors examined several variables correlated with exclusive breastfeeding. One of these was early S2S contact during the first 3 hours after birth. This relationship was dose-dependent; in other words, the longer the S2S contact, the higher the rates of exclusive breastfeeding. Below is the abstract:
This was a nurse-driven, hospital-based, prospective cohort study of data collected in 19 hospitals in San Bernardino and Riverside counties by California Perinatal Services Network on all mothers (n = 21 842) who delivered a singleton infant (37-40 weeks gestation) between July 2005 through June 2006. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression showed that maternal infant-feeding method intention (measured prior to birth), sociodemographic characteristics, intrapartum variables, and early skin-to-skin mother—infant contact during the first 3 hours following birth (controlling for delivery hospital) were correlated with exclusive breastfeeding during the maternity hospitalization. Compared with mothers with no early skin-to-skin contact, exclusive breastfeeding was higher in mothers who experienced skin-to-skin contact for 1 to 15 minutes (odds ratio [OR] 1.376; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.189-1.593), 16 to 30 minutes (OR 1.665; 95% CI, 1.468-1.888), 31 to 59 minutes (OR 2.357; 95% CI, 2.061-2.695), and more than 1 hour (OR 3.145; 95% CI, 2.905-3.405). The results demonstrate a dose—response relationship between early skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding exclusivity.
This study is significant for several reasons. First, it was a prospective (rahter than retrospective) study with a large sample size of over 21,000 mother-infant pairs. It also teased out the true assocation between S2S contact and breastfeeding rates, independent of maternal intention, sociodemographic characteristics, and events occurring during labor (specifically, forms of analgesia/anesthesia used and method of delivery). From the article's introduction:
From July 2005 through June 2006, PSN (Perinatal Services Network of Loma Linda University Medical Center/Children’s Hospital) enacted a prospective cohort, nurse-driven, hospital-based quality assurance intervention (n = 21 842 mother–infant dyads) to promote, support, and improve the development of newborns through bonding and attachment and early mother–infant skin-to-skin contact during the first 3 hours following birth. Analysis of the PSN data provided the opportunity to fill a gap in the early skin-to-skin literature. It was our intention to include in one study maternal infant-feeding intention, sociodemographic characteristics, intrapartum variables, and the length of time spent in early skin-to-skin mother–infant contact during the first 3 hours following birth (controlling for the hospital of birth) to determine their association with exclusive breastfeeding during the maternity hospital stay. In addition, this program allowed us to examine a possible dose–response relationship between early skin-to-skin contact within the first 3 hours post birth and the likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding during the maternity hospital stay.
At the end of the article, the authors discuss the clinical implications of their findings:

The clinical implications for this study are numerous. The current study has provided data demonstrating that early skin-to-skin contact is clinically effective with respect to increasing exclusive breastfeeding during the maternity hospital stay. Results from our study imply that there is a need to increase the length of exposure to early skin-to-skin contact during the early postpartum period. These results provide important information that peripartum staff can include in their postpartum program planning, policies, and intervention. Maternity caregivers can specifically allocate resources to woman who may be less likely to breastfeed by encouraging skin-to-skin contact during the early postpartum period. Walters and colleagues surveyed their hospital peripartum nursing staff after their early skin-to-skin contact (birth kangaroo care) pilot study. The peripartum personnel surveyed after the study stated that implementing early skin-to-skin contact did not take them longer nor did its implementation add to their workload.

Numerous interfering events during the maternity hospital stay can cause problems for mothers who intend to breastfeed. Events that interfere with breastfeeding may be decreased by allowing the mother and infant uninterrupted early skin-to-skin contact. Programs such as PSN’s pave the way to reestablish breastfeeding as the gold standard. One way to accomplish this seems to be facilitating uninterrupted, extended, early skin-to-skin mother–infant contact. We agree with the suggestion by Moore and Anderson that “the ideal intervention would include the mother-infant dyad experiencing skin-to-skin contact not only as early as possible, but also as often as possible, and for as long as possible each time, at least during the entire postpartum stay.” Our findings, if incorporated into hospital-based practices and protocols, can strengthen maternal–infant bonding and attachment and early exclusive breastfeeding behaviors. This is the ultimate goal, but in the interim we recommend the continuation and expansion of programs such as PSN’s early skin-to-skin mother–infant contact, nurse-driven, hospital-based intervention for a minimum of 2 hours during the first 3 hours following birth.
Email me if you'd like to read the full text.
Read more ...

Tuesday, October 05, 2010

Lamaze/ICEA Conference part 3

I woke up Sunday morning feeling so much better. I took Dio to breakfast with me and brought him back before the first breakout session. 

Mary Lou Moore, PhD, nurse, and faculty member at Wake Forest School of Medicine, spoke about The Perinatal Care System in the 21st Century: Induction, Cesarean Birth and Late Preterm Birth, sponsored by the March of Dimes. Her presentation covered recent research showing that elective deliveries (induction and cesarean) should not be performed before 39 weeks. In addition, it's advisable not to induce at that point unless the Bishop score is 8+ for primips and 6+ for multips.

These "early term" births at 37 & 38 weeks have increased rates of complications for baby and mother. (We're not talking about mothers who go into labor spontaneously at these weeks.) It's not just an issue of fetal lung maturity, but a wide range of other physiological changes the term baby undergoes before labor beings. We only understand a small number of these complex mechanisms. We know, for example, that a baby's brain grows rapidly between 34-40 weeks; the frontal lobes are especially vulnerable to elective deliveries as they are the last to fully develop.

She then outlined several hospitals around the country that have implemented these new guidelines for elective deliveries:
  • Starting in 2004, Magee Women's Hospital in Pittsburgh implemented a policy of no elective deliveries before 39 weeks. Between 2004-2007, their rate of elective induction (EI) went down 30% and the overall induction rate fell 33%. The cesarean rate for primips dropped 60% over those years from 34.5% to 13.8%.
  • The Perinatal Quality Collaborative of North Carolina (PQCNC, pronounced "picnic") decided to stop elective deliveries before 39 weeks in 38 hospitals across the state. This led to a 12% reduction in elective deliveries, a fall in newborn complications and NICU admissions. 
  • The Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative (OPQC) has had similar outcomes.
For more information and resources on reducing early term elective deliveries, visit The March of Dimes' toolkit on reducing elective deliveries before 39 weeks. What I found most remarkable about Dr. Moore's presentation was how rapidly changes have occurred in some places. The Joint Commission backs these new guidelines for elective deliveries as part of their Perinatal Care Core Measures, giving hospitals increased motivation to implement them.

Zari joined me for the final keynote speaker: Linda Smith, author of Impact of Birthing Practices on Breastfeeding. I missed about the first third of the presentation because Suzanne Arms pulled me aside and said, "I hear I need to meet you!" (How cool is that??!) We talked about what we're both working on and her future plans in trying to gather people from all walks of life and all parts of the world to envision a new global strategy for improving all things related to birth and breastfeeding.

Back to Linda Smith's presentation...I entered right before she showed an excerpt from a fantastic new breastfeeding DVD Skin to Skin in the First Hour After Birth: Practical Advice for Staff after Vaginal and Cesarean Birth. Here's an excerpt for you to watch:

I really hope I can obtain a copy of this DVD to review. It was produced for health care providers and teaches immediate, uninterrupted skin-to-skin for both vaginal and cesarean births. It also shows nine stages that newborns go through in the first hour after birth when they are placed skin-to-skin immediately after the birth. Really amazing stuff!

Linda emphasized that 30+ years of birth advocacy have done little to change childbearing practices. However, using the breastfeeding angle to change birth practices has been remarkably successful. In fact, the new Baby-Friendly curriculum includes a Mother-Friendly module as part of step 3: "Inform all pregnant women about the benefits and management of breastfeeding." I wasn't able to write down the details, since I was keeping Zari occupied, but you can email Linda if you'd like more information about this. She urged us to keep an eye out for the Surgeon General's breastfeeding statement that will be coming out in the next few months. There's a lot of support behind breastfeeding--witness Michelle Obama's many supportive statements about breastfeeding--especially because it is associated with lower obesity rates. In sum, if you want to change birthing practices, use the breastfeeding angle. There's a lot of money, government support,  momentum behind breastfeeding, so run with that to improve health care for both mothers and babies!
Read more ...

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Seminar on Skin-to-Skin care with Nils Bergman

Optimizing Infant Neural Regulation: 
The Practice and Science of Skin-to-Skin Care

July 13, 2010 
Chicago, IL

Nils Bergman, MD, MPH University of Cape Town, South Africa
Heidelise Als, PhD Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard University
Stephen Porges, PhD University of Illinois at Chicago, Brain-Body Center

Rosemont Hotel 7:00 am - 5:00 pm
Registration Fee: $160 ; Early registration: (by May 15, 2010) $140

The NIDCAP Training Center at UIMC along with the Departments of Women and Children’s Services, Pediatrics and Obstetrics is pleased to present a clinically practical, evidence-based, one-day seminar for physicians, nurses, psychologists, lactation consultants and therapists in the use of skin-to-skin care (kangaroo care) with term and preterm infants.

Click here for more information and registration information. 
Read more ...

Saturday, December 08, 2007

Value of skin-to-skin contact

This article from the Daily Mail shows how skin-to-skin contact--an element of kangaroo mother care--saved a very premature baby weighing only 20 ounces that doctors had given up for dead.
Read more ...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...